EPA says it will delay pollution rules for coal plants
Share this @internewscast.com


The Trump administration says that it plans to delay and potentially loosen water pollution rules for coal-fired power plants.

In a press release, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said Monday that it will “propose to extend compliance deadlines” for some of the requirements in a Biden-era regulation.

The agency also said that it also “intends to explore other flexibilities to promote reliable and affordable power generation” but did not specify which parts of the rule it will consider loosening. 

The Biden administration has said that strict pollution standards for coal plants are needed because without them people would be exposed to toxic substances. It said its rule would prevent more than 660 million pounds of pollution each year.

Its rule, it claimed, could reduce exposures to substances that are linked to bladder cancer, loss of IQ points and cardiovascular disease.

The Trump administration, however, argues that changes are needed to bolster the electric grid.

“As our electric grid faces unprecedented load growth, EPA remains committed to promoting reliable, affordable, and domestically-sourced resources—including beautiful, clean coal to support American manufacturing, job creation, and economic and energy independence,” said EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin in a written statement.

“We know there are serious concerns about the compliance timelines, and we must consider more realistic options that may prevent the burdensome costs required by the current regulation from hurting American families.”

In its press release, the EPA said that this summer, it will propose the rule to delay the requirements and will also request information on pollution prevention technologies including cost and performance data.

Based on that information, it will decide whether it will make further changes.

The move is not necessarily a surprise: The Trump administration has repeatedly said it wants to roll back environmental regulations and listed the rule as one it could target as part of a broader hit list in March.

The administration has also taken numerous other steps to bolster coal plants.

The move received pushback from environmentalists, who said that targeting the rule could have health consequences. 

“Lee Zeldin’s proposal to allow coal companies to dump more heavy metals into our waterways defies all common sense. Zeldin has made it abundantly clear that he is willing to sacrifice just about anything—including our health and our futures—for the profit of the fossil fuel industry,” said Sierra Club climate policy director Patrick Drupp in a written statement.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Local Man Charged with Assault After Allegedly Pointing Gun at Victim, Reports WCSO

In a recent incident that unfolded in Washington County, Tennessee, law enforcement…

Australia Implements New Tax on Meta, Google, and TikTok to Support Newsroom Funding

MELBOURNE – In a bold move to support the journalism industry, Australia…

Mexican National Admits to Posing as Border Patrol Agent to Thwart Deportation Efforts: A Bold Strategy Uncovered

SAN DIEGO – In a surprising twist, a Mexican national residing in…

Florida Governor Race Heats Up: Voters Challenged to Identify Key Candidates

ORLANDO, Fla. – As the countdown to Election Day begins, the race…

Asian Markets Surge as Oil Prices Dip Following UAE’s Intent to Withdraw from OPEC

HONG KONG – On Wednesday, Asian stock markets showed a mostly positive…

Investigation Launched into Controversial Mailers in Carter County Mayoral Race

The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation (TBI) has been called upon to probe…

SantaCon Scandal Unwrapped: New York Judge Condemns Fraudulent Festivity Fiasco

NEW YORK – During the initial court appearance of the organizer behind…

UAE’s Strategic Shift: Exiting OPEC by May 1 to Redefine Global Oil Dynamics

DUBAI – In a significant development, the United Arab Emirates declared on…