Recently, Congress had a pivotal opportunity to shed light on its internal sexual misconduct investigations.

However, they opted to keep things under wraps.

In a decisive move on Wednesday, the House voted 357–65 to redirect Rep. Nancy Mace’s resolution, which called for transparency in sexual misconduct inquiries, to the Ethics Committee. This committee is notorious for sidelining transparency proposals by consigning them to obscurity. In the political landscape of Washington, referring an issue to a committee often equates to quietly shelving it.

Mace had cautioned that this was precisely the intention of the leadership from both parties.

In a conversation with journalists within the Capitol complex just before the vote, the Republican from South Carolina expressed that the decision was a foregone conclusion.

The resolution she proposed was clear-cut. It aimed to mandate the House Ethics Committee to maintain and make public records related to investigations concerning sexual harassment or inappropriate relationships between Congress members and their staff. While the identities of victims would remain confidential, the details of the investigations would be disclosed to the public.

The motion to send the… pic.twitter.com/Q11UcFU5fU

— Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives (@dom_lucre) March 5, 2026

“Democrats and Republicans are, I think, whipping to refer it to committee, which means they’re going to protect each other. Once again, it will fail, and we won’t get accountability or transparency. The American people are held to one standard, and Congress is held wholly to another.” 

Her resolution was straightforward. It required the House Ethics Committee to preserve and publicly release records tied to investigations involving sexual harassment or sexual relationships between members of Congress and their staff. Victims’ identities would be redacted, but the investigative material itself would become public.

Right now, most of those investigations happen almost entirely behind closed doors. The Ethics Committee can investigate members, but the public rarely sees the reports, the evidence, or the conclusions. Cases disappear into the committee process, and voters are left guessing about what actually happened and how Congress handled it.

Mace argues in her interview that the secrecy protects the institution far more than it protects victims.

“You’re going to watch men in Congress, Republicans and Democrats this afternoon, hide behind the veil of ‘let the process play out,’ and it’s going to get referred to committee and will not see the light of day, and it never will see the light of day, because the process is broken.”

Leaders in both parties moved quickly to block the proposal, arguing that releasing investigation records could discourage victims or witnesses from cooperating with future inquiries. 

Three hundred fifty-seven members chose to send the measure to committee rather than allow the public to see what the Ethics Committee has uncovered over the years.

Not one Member who voted against our transparency resolution gets to pretend they care about Epstein’s victims. You voted to protect predators in your own government.

Sit down.

— Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) March 4, 2026

And all of this is happening while Congress is already dealing with another disturbing misconduct scandal involving one of its own. Republican Rep. Tony Gonzales (TX-23) has faced scrutiny over a romantic relationship with a staff member, something House rules explicitly prohibit between lawmakers and employees they supervise.

These are the Members of Congress who voted to bury sexual harassment records of Members of Congress and keep you in the dark: https://t.co/uFR2JcHEOi

— Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) March 4, 2026

The situation became even more disturbing after the staffer later died in September 2025 after setting herself on fire, a tragedy that cast an even harsher spotlight on the relationship and the power imbalance involved.

It’s Done: Bondi Tells Congress She’s Released All the Epstein Files, No More Coming

That case helped spark Mace’s push for broader transparency. Her proposal was not limited to one incident. It would have required the Ethics Committee to release records tied to every investigation involving sexual harassment or sexual misconduct by members of Congress.

Hundreds of lawmakers had a choice. They could vote for transparency, or they could vote to keep the system exactly the way it is.

Three hundred fifty-seven voted to keep it exactly that way.

Congress loves transparency.

Until it applies to Congress

Editor’s Note: The mainstream media isn’t interested in the facts; they’re only interested in attacking the president. Help us continue to get to the bottom of stories like the Jeffrey Epstein files by supporting our truth-seeking journalism today.