SCOTUS Allows ICE to Keep Arresting Illegals in Sanctuary City Los Angeles
Share this @internewscast.com

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to bypass a lower court’s decision. This earlier ruling had prevented Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from conducting federal immigration enforcement activities, citing these actions as racial profiling.

In July, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by then-President Joe Biden. She had stopped ICE from executing raids in the sanctuary area of Los Angeles, California.

Before the Trump administration sought SCOTUS’s intervention to let ICE persist in capturing illegal immigrants in Los Angeles during the legal proceedings, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had supported Frimpong’s decision.

On Monday, Justice Kavanaugh, representing the conservative majority in a 6-3 decision, stated that “the government has adequately demonstrated the need for a stay while the appeal is pending.”

Justice Kavanaugh emphasized that “stopping individuals based on reasonable suspicions of unlawful presence has long played a critical role in U.S. immigration enforcement efforts for decades, spanning multiple presidential terms.” With the current rise in illegal immigration under Biden, ICE’s attention on Los Angeles appears justified.

Kavanaugh further noted, “Individuals in the country illegally seeking to avoid law enforcement questioning are essentially aiming to bypass the law, which does not constitute a significant legal interest.”

Meanwhile, Justice Sotomayor, in writing a dissenting opinion that Justices Kagan and Jackson joined, called the court’s stay on the lower court’s decision “yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket.”

“We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job,” Sotomayor writes. “Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent.”

The case is Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, No. 25A169 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Tragedy Strikes: Three Fatalities as Massive Waves Hit Popular Holiday Island

Tragedy struck a popular British vacation destination as three individuals lost their…

Putin’s Handshake with Health Expert Ignites Fresh Discourse on His Wellbeing

A recent handshake between Vladimir Putin and a health expert has ignited…

Jordon Hudson Avoids Meeting with Bill Belichick’s Daughter-in-Law

In a recent display of composure, Jordon Hudson and Jennifer Schmitt, Bill…

From Bond Girl to Beatles Bride: A Look at Barbara Bach’s 44-Year Marriage Journey

Barbara Bach, now 79, became an icon for many American fans as…

Shocking Discovery: Top Police Union Leader Found Dead at Home – Details Inside

The sudden passing of Ian Leavers, the former leader of the Queensland…

Explosive Claim: Fox News Host Labels Tucker Carlson as a ‘Nazi Promoter’ – Uncover the Controversy

Fox News personality Mark Levin has launched a scathing attack on his…

Joe Biden’s Emotional Tribute: Father Reflects on Late Son Beau’s Presidential Potential

In a surprising declaration, Joe Biden expressed that his late son, Beau,…

Care Home Manager Accused of Drugging Colleague Amid Fake Will Scandal Faces Jail Time

Seven years prior to orchestrating a fraudulent will, concerns had already surfaced…

Vandals Deface Beloved Rock Formations at Utah National Park, Leaving Hikers Heartbroken

During the government shutdown, vandals have targeted Utah’s Arches National Park, leaving…

Farage Predicts BBC Licence Fee’s Demise Amidst Controversy Over Trump Interview Edits

Nigel Farage has issued a stark warning to the BBC, claiming it…

Tragic Hit-and-Run Claims Life of Kansas College Student Jogging: Community Seeks Justice

A tragic incident unfolded near the Lawrence Regional Airport, just west of…

Discover the Ultimate Solution That Banished My Rosacea for Good!

“Wow, you’re looking really red. Are you OK?” Anyone with rosacea is…