In a noteworthy financial move, Eric Swalwell’s campaign has allocated over $300,000 to a law firm renowned for its expertise in white-collar criminal defense, as per Federal Election Commission records. This expenditure unfolded over seven years through 44 separate payments, with individual amounts varying between $250 and over $35,000.
The law firm in question is Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass, a reputable Bay Area firm specializing in criminal defense and employment law. These payments correspond to a timeline that encompasses significant investigative episodes involving Swalwell. Notably, in 2018, the Justice Department launched an effort to secure records from various congressional members, including Swalwell. Additionally, the House Ethics Committee conducted a probe into his interactions with a suspected Chinese intelligence operative, which concluded in 2023.
The campaign has attributed these legal expenses to the pressures exerted by the Trump administration, emphasizing the necessity to brace for potential investigations. However, while referencing these inquiries, the campaign has not pinpointed a specific legal issue directly tied to the financial outlay.
When pressed for a concrete example, the campaign reiterated the 2018 Department of Justice records seizure and the ethics investigation, both of which are already public knowledge.
Meanwhile, Democratic infighting has taken a dramatic turn with a recent ad by Tom Steyer targeting Swalwell, sparking strong reactions within the party.
The campaign says the spending was tied to pressure from the Trump administration and the need to prepare for possible investigations.
A spokesman for Swalwell’s campaign said the payments were for legal guidance amid President Donald Trump’s “retaliatory investigations” that “have put his family and staff at risk.”
The campaign points to those investigations but does not identify a specific legal matter tied to the spending, and when asked for an example, it cited the 2018 DOJ records seizure and the ethics probe, both already public.
The attorney who received the payments described the work as compliance advice and preparation, not tied to any specific case.
“I was retained as outside counsel to provide legal guidance to the congressman’s office, ensuring staff remained fully compliant with applicable laws and prepared for potential contact from politically motivated actors. This was not related to any employment matter.”
President Donald Trump was in office for four of the seven years covered by those payments, a period the campaign cites in explaining the legal costs tied to potential investigations. The filings show those payments continuing across multiple reporting cycles, rather than tied to a single event or discrete legal matter, including years when no new investigative action was publicly identified. That pattern reflects ongoing outside legal involvement over time, not a one-time response to a specific development.
Adam Schiff faced similar scrutiny, including the reported DOJ records sweep, yet his campaign filings do not show comparable spending on white-collar criminal defense attorneys during that period; later, as scrutiny increased, he took a different approach by creating a legal defense fund.
More than $300,000. Forty-four payments. Criminal defense attorneys. Those payments were made with campaign funds, yet the filings do not tie them to any specific case.
Come November, voters will decide whether that adds up.
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
