Share this @internewscast.com
Fresh evidence obtained by Candace Owens is calling into question official accounts about where conservative activist Charlie Kirk was transported after his fatal shooting, reopening scrutiny of how the tragic episode was reported and handled by both authorities and the press.
For several weeks, official accounts suggested that Kirk had been transported to Timpanogos Regional Hospital following the ambush at Utah Valley University. However, recent revelations from newly surfaced emails are casting doubt on this narrative, suggesting he may have been taken instead to the Utah Valley Hospital, a larger Level 1 trauma center renowned for its emergency services.
“We received numerous tips claiming Charlie was not at Timpanogos Hospital but at the hospital associated with UVU,” said Owens, highlighting the confusion faced by her team. “Timpanogos is a Level 3 trauma center, whereas the closer and more equipped option was the Utah Valley Hospital.”
The uncertainty intensified with more eyewitness accounts. “Several individuals stated, ‘I was at the UVU hospital when Charlie was brought in. I assure you, he was definitely at this facility,’” Owens recounted.
Adding to the intrigue, Owens shared another account from someone who was receiving treatment at Utah Valley Hospital. This person reportedly overheard an announcement that Charlie had just passed away upstairs, which Owens found particularly puzzling.
Internal Hospital Emails Suggest Restricted Access
The most significant piece of evidence came in the form of an email from a staff member at Utah Valley Hospital. This email reportedly confirmed that Kirk’s records were indeed at their facility. Owens described it as compelling proof: “We received an email from someone on the medical staff at UVU, asserting Kirk was here. They claimed to have a medical file, and at 2:08 p.m., they texted that they were instructed not to access it.”


Owens read from the email: “Here is the entry in the UVU system for Charlie Kirk. It included his correct birth date, age, and an MRN number. The message also shared an internal directive prohibiting access to the file. It read: ‘Hi all. Today’s media event resulted in a trauma patient… Due to the sensitive nature, only Deborah and I are permitted to access the chart. No one else should view or open the chart.’”
Despite these revelations, the situation remains murky. Owens noted she considered the possibility of record-sharing between hospitals: “I said maybe the reason for this is these two medical hospitals speak to each other… like if you pick up a prescription at one CVS, the other location knows that it happens. I’ve confirmed that doesn’t seem to be the circumstance.”
She further suggested that physician logistics could be the answer: “It’s possible that it could be because maybe Dr. Lee Trotter, which I have heard, works at both—limited surgeons going back and forth. That’s somehow created a file. But I’d like to know definitively what the answer for that is. Why he also has a file at UVU. Why there seem to be so much confusion.”
Throughout the segment, Owens took pains not to jump to conclusions, stating, “We don’t need to go crazy with conspiracy theories. There could be a logical answer. I have not stumbled upon it yet. And so medical community, feel free to email us.”
However, her main takeaway is clear: all parties around this episode are acting with what she calls “suspicious” opacity. “There could be a logical reason. But it just seems like all parties around this UVU event are acting suspicious,” Owens said, underscoring a sense of distrust in the official narrative.
This new revelation adds to an ongoing pattern of inconsistencies from those involved in the aftermath of the Kirk shooting. While there may still be an innocent or technical explanation for the records at Utah Valley Hospital, the lack of forthright clarification from hospitals, law enforcement, and others continues to erode public confidence in the process.
Once again, what transpired after the death of Charlie Kirk appears deeply at odds with the initial story presented to the public. At minimum, Candace Owens’ investigation has laid bare that the facts about Kirk’s final hours were misrepresented—and that any logical explanation, if it exists, remains stubbornly out of reach.