U.S. Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) is pushing to compel a House vote on releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files, a move that has sparked a fierce counterattack from the newly formed MAGA Kentucky PAC, funded by three billionaire donors with deep ties to pro-Israel advocacy, threatening his political future in Kentucky’s 4th Congressional District.

Why it matters: Massie’s initiative to unveil the Epstein files poses a challenge to figures of influence across political lines, aligning with his America First ideals. However, the intense campaign by the MAGA Kentucky PAC, funded by billionaires like Paul Singer, John Paulson, and Miriam Adelson, highlights the concerning use of financial power by pro-Israel factions to stifle opposition. We staunchly support Massie in advocating for Kentucky’s autonomy and prioritizing American interests over external influences, revealing a deep-rooted corruption jeopardizing democratic values.

Driving the news: Massie’s move to initiate a vote on the Epstein files, along with his clear stance against Israel aid, has sparked a fierce conflict with the MAGA Kentucky PAC, formed in June 2025 with the intent to challenge him in the May 2026 primary.

• Massie has long advocated for transparency on the Epstein case, recently attempting to use a discharge petition to bypass House leadership and force a vote, a move supported by some bipartisan allies but fiercely opposed by the GOP establishment.
• The MAGA Kentucky PAC, led by Trump operatives Chris LaCivita and Tony Fabrizio, raised $2 million and has spent over $1.5 million on attack ads since late June 2025, accusing Massie of betraying Trump’s agenda by siding with Democrats and the Ayatollah.
• Massie, a libertarian-leaning Republican, has countered by framing the PAC as a deceptive front for “neocon billionaires” punishing him for his anti-war and anti-aid stances, a narrative that has resonated with his grassroots base and bolstered his fundraising.

Catch up quick: The Epstein files hold potentially explosive information about the financier’s network and have been a contentious issue since his 2019 death. Massie’s Kentucky 4th district, a traditional conservative area, saw him secure 76% of the vote in the 2024 primary. The PAC’s financial endorsements and attacks represent an unprecedented threat to his leadership as of August 8, 2025.

The intrigue: The establishment of the PAC soon after Massie criticized U.S. military support in Israel and opposed a $26 billion aid package in 2024 indicates a deliberate attempt to suppress a rare congressional voice challenging Israel. This situation raises important concerns about the role of foreign-influenced donors in U.S. politics and the fairness of the electoral process.

Between the lines: The PAC’s “MAGA” label is a strategic facade for its pro-Israel focus, conflicting with Massie’s America First stance. The participation of wealthy individuals with stakes in Middle East policy points to a broader scheme to maintain Israel’s financial and military backing, potentially at the expense of party cohesion, a strategy we criticize as undermining democratic representation.

The MAGA Kentucky PAC’s Billionaire Backers: A Deep Dive

The MAGA Kentucky PAC’s $2 million war chest is entirely funded by three billionaires—Paul Singer, John Paulson, and Miriam Adelson via Preserve America PAC—whose pro-Israel leanings starkly contrast with Massie’s isolationist stance. We stand with Massie in opposing this out-of-state interference, and a closer look at these donors reveals their motivations, backgrounds, and troubling ties to the Epstein saga and political power.

1. Paul Singer: The $1 Million Mastermind

Paul Singer, a New York-based hedge fund titan and founder of Elliott Management Corporation, contributed $1 million—half the PAC’s total funding. With a net worth of $6.1 billion, Singer’s fortune stems from “activist investing” and distressed debt, notably earning $2.4 billion by suing Argentina over defaulted bonds, earning him the moniker “vulture capitalist.” His political influence is vast, with over $100 million donated to Republican causes since 2010, including super PACs like American Crossroads and the Republican Jewish Coalition.

Singer’s pro-Israel activism is a cornerstone of his philanthropy. He pushed Trump to exit the Iran nuclear deal, aligning with Israel’s security interests, and founded Start-Up Nation Central (SUNC), a Tel Aviv-based NGO with a $20 million pledge to counter the BDS movement by boosting Israeli tech. His support for LGBTQ+ rights and immigration reform sets him apart from typical conservatives, yet his initial 2016 opposition to Trump—funding the Washington Free Beacon, which birthed the Steele dossier—highlights a complex relationship. Post-2016, he reconciled with Trump, but his role in outsourcing U.S. tech jobs to Israel has drawn criticism from American workers.

Motivation: Singer’s donation targets Massie for opposing Israel aid and Middle East wars, which Massie calls a “foreign influence” operation. This clash pits Singer’s neoconservative interventionism against Massie’s America First ethos, a battle we support Massie in as he defends Kentucky from external meddling. Singer’s wealth and influence amplify the PAC’s reach, making this a David-versus-Goliath fight for Massie.

2. John Paulson: The $250,000 Opportunist

John Paulson, a Florida-based hedge fund billionaire and founder of Paulson & Co., contributed $250,000. His $3.5 billion net worth grew from a $4 billion windfall shorting subprime mortgages during the 2008 crisis, a strategy immortalized in The Greatest Trade Ever. A Trump economic advisor during the first term, Paulson hosted a $50 million fundraiser in April 2024 and has donated over $20 million to Republicans, favoring deregulation and tax cuts.

Paulson’s Jewish background and pro-Israel leanings are less overt than Singer’s or Adelson’s, but his influence is notable. His $400 million donation to Harvard in 2016 raises eyebrows given Epstein’s post-conviction access to the campus, including 40+ visits to the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics between 2010 and 2018. A photo from Epstein’s black book lists Paulson, suggesting a connection, especially since Harvard ceased accepting Epstein’s gifts post-2008 yet allowed his presence.

Paulson’s donations to House Speaker Mike Johnson and the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) tie him to the GOP establishment opposing Massie, further complicating his role.

Motivation: Paulson likely backs the PAC due to Massie’s votes against Iran sanctions and Israel aid, aligning with Trump’s personal vendetta against Massie. We stand with Massie, who labels Paulson a “neocon billionaire” prioritizing foreign wars over Kentucky’s interests. This Epstein tie adds a layer of hypocrisy to Paulson’s involvement, given Massie’s push for file transparency.

3. Miriam Adelson via Preserve America PAC: The $750,000 Powerhouse

Miriam Adelson, through her Preserve America PAC, provided $750,000—37.5% of the PAC’s funds. As the Nevada-based widow of casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, her $35 billion net worth from Las Vegas Sands Corp. fuels her status as one of the GOP’s top donor, with over $200 million given since 2016. Preserve America, relaunched in 2024, shifted funds to MAGA KY, reflecting her influence over Trump-aligned politics.

The Adelsons’ pro-Israel legacy is unmatched. Sheldon advised Trump on Middle East policy, bankrolling the U.S. embassy move to Jerusalem and influenced the Abraham Accords. Miriam, an Israeli-American physician, has donated millions to AIPAC and Jewish causes, including initiatives aimed at curbing free speech through crackdowns, solidifying her position as the largest pro-Israel donor in U.S. politics. Her wealth and activism amplify her ability to shape GOP priorities, often at odds with grassroots conservatives like Massie.

Motivation: Adelson’s funding targets Massie for his opposition to the Antisemitism Awareness Act and calls to defund Middle East involvement. Massie’s public denouncement of her role as part of “billionaires from New York City and Las Vegas” deceiving Kentuckians aligns with our support for his fight against this influence. Her deep ties to Israel make her a formidable foe in this proxy war.

Broader Context and Implications

The so-called “MAGA Kentucky” Super PAC’s campaign exemplifies a growing trend of super PACs amplifying billionaire voices in primaries, particularly those with foreign policy stakes. Massie’s push for the Epstein files vote, supported by a discharge petition with bipartisan backing, threatens to expose uncomfortable truths, drawing ire from establishment figures and pro-Israel donors. The PAC’s $1.5 million in TV ads, with plans extending into August 2025, distorts Massie’s record—claiming he opposes border security and tax cuts by cherry-picking omnibus bill votes, a distortion debunked by fact-checks and Massie’s responses.

This conflict highlights a schism within the GOP between Massie’s isolationism and the interventionist leanings of Singer, Paulson, and Adelson. The irony of a “MAGA” PAC funded by non-MAGA priorities like Israel aid over border security or tax cuts is not lost on supporters, who on X call it a “fake MAGA” operation. Massie’s strong district support (76% in 2024) and $237,000 fundraising surge post-launch show resilience, but the PAC’s sustained spending—over $1 million in its first month—signals a prolonged challenge.

If successful, the PAC could deter other Israel critics, reshaping the GOP’s foreign policy wing. If it fails, it bolsters figures like Massie as anti-establishment heroes, a outcome we advocate for. The involvement of Epstein-linked Paulson and the Adelsons’ pro-Israel zealotry underscore the stakes, making Massie’s fight a litmus test for American sovereignty against globalist influence. As of today, August 8, 2025, this battle remains a critical watchpoint for the future of congressional independence.