President Trump holds the power to dismiss Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell if there is justified cause based on supporting evidence, stated White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett on Sunday. Hassett also mentioned that the Fed needs to explain the renovation cost overruns at its Washington headquarters.
During an interview on ABC’s “This Week,” Hassett, who serves as the director of the National Economic Council, remarked that Trump’s potential decision to remove Powell over a reported $700 million cost overrun hinges significantly on the responses to the inquiries that Russ Vought has directed towards the Fed.
Last week, Vought, the White House budget director, criticized Powell for what he termed an “extravagant refurbishment” of the Fed facilities. He demanded answers regarding the $2.5 billion project, likening it to France’s Palace of Versailles, noting elements like rooftop gardens, water features, and luxurious marble in a post on X.
Hassett’s comments confirm that the Trump administration is actively exploring the renovation costs and Powell’s testimony about the project as a possible avenue to try to fire the Fed chief well before his term as chair ends next May.
Trump has repeatedly called for Powell’s resignation for failing to lower interest rates since Trump returned to office in January.
Vice President JD Vance piled on more criticism in a post on X on Sunday: “Fed has been totally asleep at the wheel. As President Trump says, they’re TOO LATE–both in fighting inflation during Biden and in lower rates now.”
The Fed on Friday appeared to rebut some of Vought’s claims in a “Frequently Asked Questions” posting about the project, describing it as the first complete renovation of the buildings since their construction in the 1930s, including removing lead contamination and more asbestos than initially anticipated.
It shows pictures of leaky pipes and roofs and notes that costs have risen due to increased material, equipment and labor costs. It denied assertions that there were VIP dining rooms or elevators being installed. The project will have a “green roof” using plants to help manage water runoff and aid with heating and cooling, as many other federal buildings have used for decades but no terrace access.
“There are no new water features, there’s no beehives, and there’s no roof terrace gardens,” Powell told U.S. senators in testimony in June, denying excessive spending on the project.
Powell said the almost 90-year-old headquarters “was not really safe, and it was not waterproof” while acknowledging cost overruns.
The Fed has said that the project, which includes upgrades to an adjacent building, will consolidate staff into a single campus and reduce off-site lease costs. As of February, a Fed Inspector General report estimated that costs had risen to $2.4 billion from an estimate of $1.9 billion two years earlier, a $500 million increase.
Asked if Trump had the authority to fire Powell, Hassett, whose name has emerged as a potential candidate to take over the Fed chair job, said: “That’s a thing that’s being looked into, but certainly if there’s cause, he does.”
Rep. French Hill (R-Ark.), who chairs the powerful House Financial Services Committee, said Trump did not have the authority to fire the Fed chair, but Congress would continue to provide strong oversight of the central bank.
“Just because Congress created the Fed and that we believe that it should be independent in the setting of monetary policy, it doesn’t mean that it’s immune from criticism,” Hill told CBS’ Face the Nation. “Every president since World War II has had choice words for the Fed chair when they’ve not been in sync with the direction of the president.”
Separately on Sunday, Kevin Warsh, a former Fed Board of Governors member who is considered a potential candidate to replace Powell, said the U.S. central bank needs “regime change” that goes beyond the chair position.
“The Fed has lost its way. It’s lost its way in supervision, it’s lost its way in monetary policy,” Warsh said in a Sunday interview on Fox’s “Sunday Morning Futures” program.
“We need regime change at the Fed, and that’s not just about the chairman. It’s about a whole range of people, it’s about changing their mindset and their models, and frankly it’s about breaking some heads, because the way they’ve been doing business is not working.”
