President Trump’s own political appointees played a crucial role in sustaining the fraudulent Russiagate narrative crafted by the Obama administration, according to an extensive Real Clear Investigations report.
The article reveals that former Special Counsel John Durham, along with key figures such as National Security Adviser John Bolton, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and CIA Director Gina Haspel, either ignored or concealed vital intelligence that could have disproved the basis of the Russiagate narrative—the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA).
Initially, the ICA asserted, without substantive evidence, that Russian President Vladimir Putin had directed actions to help Donald Trump secure victory in the 2016 presidential election. This claim relied heavily on the Steele dossier, a document financed by the Clinton campaign, which contained unverified and dubious allegations.
Crucial members of Trump’s administration kept these revelations from him, which allowed the erroneous narrative to persist unchallenged.
At the CIA, while Pompeo expressed doubts about the investigation’s findings, he nonetheless impeded congressional efforts to scrutinize the evidence. Meanwhile, his deputy, Gina Haspel, restricted access to essential intelligence documents for investigators.
In January 2021, before leaving her position, Haspel secured all drafts and notes from the House Intelligence Committee’s report, which challenged the ICA, in a CIA gun safe. She insisted on keeping them classified, effectively burying the truth until after the 2020 election.
Despite being appointed to examine the origins of Russiagate, Special Counsel Durham opted not to declassify crucial documents and appeared to overlook a wealth of evidence.
At the CIA, Pompeo was skeptical about the investigation results but actively hindered congressional probing, while his deputy Gina Haspel rigorously limited investigators’ access to key intelligence records.
“Pompeo’s deputy at the time was Gina Haspel, who appears to have played a much more active role in drawing a veil over the information… Sources told RCI she made sure the investigators’ on-site examination, which spanned from 2017 to 2020, was closely monitored and tightly controlled. The House investigators had to be cleared into a ‘read room’ at Langley each day to examine the records the CIA used to support the ICA. And they were forced to lock up their laptops and materials there when they left at night. ‘Haspel didn’t allow them to take even their notes out of their workspace there,’ Harvey said. ‘They couldn’t take anything out of the building.’ Another House Intelligence Committee source familiar with the operation said the investigators suspected the CIA ‘was spying on [committee] computers’ back on Capitol Hill. They reported back to then-committee chairman Devin Nunes that the CIA had tampered with the computers the agency forced them to use to draft their report inside headquarters – and this was only after they were denied access to any computers in the first four months of their oversight investigation… ‘Deliberate technical modifications to the [CIA-issued] computers made the machines unstable and unreliable,’ which slowed down investigators’ work, according to a committee report documenting the CIA’s efforts to ‘obstruct’ their probe.” – [Real Clear Investigations]
Before leaving office in January 2021, Haspel locked all drafts and notes of the House Intelligence Committee’s report debunking the ICA in a CIA gun safe and demanded it remain classified, ensuring the truth stayed hidden until after the 2020 election.
Special Counsel Durham, appointed to investigate the origins of Russiagate, chose not to declassify critical reports and seemingly ignored abundant evidence.
“In 2020, however, Durham insisted the ICA review be kept under wraps. Durham argued he was using the secret report, drafted by two career House Intelligence Committee investigators, in his inquiry into whether the FBI and CIA had politicized and weaponized intel against Trump. ‘Durham specifically asked for that report to not be declassified and released, along with other things, because he wanted to use it as part of his investigation and prosecutions – or so we presumed,’ the former senior ODNI intelligence official familiar with Ratcliffe’s declassification effort said. Ratcliffe, now CIA director, initially agreed to withhold the report, which remained buried for the next five years – until Trump’s new National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard declassified and publicly released it virtually unredacted in July. ‘After we gave Durham the report, along with over a thousand pages of other classified documents, he went ghost,’ said the former senior intelligence official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. ‘We didn’t hear from him, and he didn’t appear to do anything with the report.’” – [Real Clear Investigations]
The now-declassified ICA report has become pivotal evidence in criminal investigations into Obama-era intelligence officials, including Brennan and Clapper, who are accused of orchestrating the false narrative designed to subvert Trump’s presidency.
“The declassified ICA is now being used as evidence in criminal probes of Obama-era figures, including Brennan, by the Justice Department. Prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida, who are reportedly trying to build a conspiracy of corruption case, recently issued a flurry of grand jury subpoenas targeting Brennan and Clapper, former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, and other Obama-era officials who were involved in the crafting of the ICA. They seek communications records and other documents covering the 2016-2017 period when classified versions of the assessment were drafted and an unclassified version was released to the public.” – [Real Clear Investigations]
These revelations illustrate that the Russiagate hoax was not merely a flaw of the previous administration but was abetted and concealed by members of Trump’s own team, undermining his presidency and manipulating the 2020 election’s outcome.
