On Sunday, Tyler Robinson, who stands accused of the murder of Charlie Kirk, formally requested the court to prohibit the use of still cameras, video cameras, and microphones during a pivotal hearing scheduled for April 17. This session is anticipated to feature a series of motions from both the prosecution and the defense, making it a significant event in the unfolding legal drama.

As of now, Judge Tony Graf has not yet decided on whether to exclude electronic media for the entirety of the trial. The upcoming courtroom appearance of Robinson, following his previous session in the 4th District Court in Provo on February 3, 2026, has drawn considerable attention from the public and the press alike.

Notably, Fox News Legal Analyst Donna Rotunno, who also hosts the podcast “Crime & Justice with Donna Rotunno,” has commented on the situation. She suggested that Judge Graf should assert control and make a definitive decision regarding media presence in the courtroom for the remainder of the trial. This, according to Rotunno, would provide clarity and order to the proceedings.

Rotunno further speculated that the defense’s strategy might involve requesting media bans on a case-by-case basis, starting with the April 17 hearing. This approach would allow the defense to potentially mitigate the impact of an unfavorable ruling by limiting it to a single hearing rather than the entire trial. Such a tactic suggests a nuanced approach to managing media coverage as the legal battle continues to unfold.

Fox News Legal Analyst Donna Rotunno, host of the podcast “Crime & Justice with Donna Rotunno,” said Graf should “take control” and make a definitive ruling on media in the courtroom throughout the rest of the proceedings.

She said the defense asking only to ban electronic media for the April 17 hearing could be indicative of a larger strategy, and that they may ask to bar media on a hearing-by-hearing basis. That way, if Graf rules against them, they will only lose the motion for one specific hearing, and not for all the proceedings moving forward.

Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, has pleaded for cameras to be allowed during the trial.

Tyler Robinson, accused in the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, sits beside defense attorney Kathryn Nester during a hearing in 4th District Court in Provo on Jan. 16, 2026. (Bethany Baker/The Salt Lake Tribune)

“There were cameras all over my husband when he was murdered,” she told Fox News’ Jesse Watters in an exclusive interview in November. “There have been cameras all over my friends and family mourning. There have been cameras all over me, analyzing my every move, analyzing my every smile, my every tear. We deserve to have cameras in there.”

“Why not be transparent?” Kirk continued. “There’s nothing to hide. I know there’s not because I’ve seen what the case is built on.”

Prosecutors also filed a response to a motion filed by Robinson’s team last week, asking the court to push a May 18 preliminary hearing back. The defense is asking to push back the preliminary hearing until expert discovery is complete, and prosecutors argue that the hearing should be held on the scheduled date.

Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk’s widow, speaks at the public memorial service for right-wing activist Charlie Kirk at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, on September 21, 2025. (Patrick T. Fallon/AFP)

The state argues that the defense is trying to confer upon itself rights during the preliminary stage of the trial that it is not entitled to until the actual trial itself, and that discovery is meant to be reserved for the trial, not preliminary proceedings.

Rotunno agrees that the defense has been given enough discovery leeway in the preliminary stage of the court proceedings, and that the hearing should remain scheduled for May 18.