NEW YORK (AP) — Authorities in New York are delving into allegations involving Colombian President Gustavo Petro and potential connections to drug traffickers, according to information from two insiders familiar with the situation.
The sources, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the investigation, shared these insights with The Associated Press, as they were not permitted to speak publicly about the ongoing probe.
In recent months, prosecutors based in Brooklyn and Manhattan have been interrogating drug traffickers about their interactions with Petro. They are particularly interested in claims that his representatives may have sought bribes to prevent their extradition to the United States, as revealed by one of the knowledgeable individuals.
The source added that it remains uncertain if any criminal charges have been directed at Petro by federal prosecutors.
This inquiry is partly centered on accusations that Petro’s associates allegedly requested bribes from drug traffickers incarcerated at Colombia’s La Picota prison, in return for assurances against extradition to the US, according to one source.
Meanwhile, a representative for the Colombian presidency has declined to provide any comments concerning the ongoing investigation or related legal matters.
Petro has consistently denied allegations of drug trafficking, particularly after Trump labeled him an “illegal drug leader” and the Treasury Department sanctioned him in late 2025 for alleged ties to the trade without offering evidence. Petro maintains that, while his administration aggressively targets major cartels, it remains focused on a more lenient, social-based approach for peasant farmers who cultivate coca leaf.
The federal inquiry was reported earlier Friday by The New York Times.
Petro came under scrutiny through the course of drug trafficking investigations by New York authorities that led them to identify him as a subject, according to another person familiar with the matter.
The inquiries into Petro are in the early stages and it is not clear whether they will result in charges, this person said, adding the White House has had no role in the investigations.
Petro, a former rebel leader, soared into office promising to reduce the country’s dependence on fossil fuels and reallocate state resources to addressing entrenched poverty.
A leftist politician known for winding sometimes incoherent speeches, he has regularly criticized the Trump administration over its support for Israel, bombing of drug boats in the Caribbean and likened the White House migration crackdown to “Nazi” tactics.
After one such outburst, at a pro-Palestinian demonstration outside the United Nations headquarters in New York, Trump retaliated by revoking Petro’s US visa. He also briefly slapped high tariffs on Colombia over Petro’s refusal to accept deportation flights from the United States.
But more recently, the two have shown signs of getting along. After a meeting at the White House in February, Trump described Petro as “terrific.”
Colombian authorities have for years been investigating members of Petro’s family for possible criminal acts.
His son, Nicolás Petro, was charged in 2023 with soliciting illegal campaign contributions from a convicted drug trafficker to fund a lavish lifestyle of expensive cars and homes. The younger Petro has pleaded not guilty and his father has said none of the money was used to fund his campaign.
The president’s brother, Juan Fernando Petro, has also been implicated in secret negotiations that allegedly took place with imprisoned drug traffickers to shield them from extradition to the US in exchange for their disarmament.
Politics in Colombia have long been tainted by cocaine, of which it is the world’s largest supplier. In the 1980s, drug lord Pablo Escobar was elected to the country’s Congress with the support of one of Colombia’s most traditional parties. A decade later, his rivals from the Cali cartel flooded the presidential campaign of Ernesto Samper with illegal donations.
The now-defunct urban guerrilla group Petro belonged to, the 19th of April Movement, has long been suspected of taking money from Escobar’s Medellin cartels as part of its deadly siege of the Supreme Court in 1985. Petro did not participate in the attack, which left several guerrillas and around half the high court’s magistrates dead. Leaders of the group have always denied any links to the cartel.
