A former RAF base, controversially selected to accommodate 2,000 asylum seekers, has been found to contain ground gases and unexploded artillery, according to a government minister.
RAF Scampton in Lincolnshire is among the three locations the Home Office plans to repurpose for housing asylum seekers, aiming to cut costs associated with hotel accommodations.
The government’s strategy includes three sites: the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset; the former military base in Wethersfield, Essex; and RAF Scampton, with the goal of providing 3,000 asylum seeker accommodations across these locations.
Currently, the Bibby Stockholm and Wethersfield sites together accommodate fewer than 1,000 individuals, and RAF Scampton has yet to receive any residents, although the first group of 60 is expected to arrive in the coming weeks.
A letter from Housing Minister Lee Rowley to the West Lindsey District Council, which oversees the area where RAF Scampton is located, outlined concerns about “potential risks to human health from ground gases, unexploded ordnance (UXO), and ground contamination, affecting both workers and asylum seekers on the site.”
Former military base RAF Scampton (pictured) earmarked to house 2,000 asylum seekers has had ground gases and unexploded artillery found on the land, a minister has claimed
Migrants are brought in to Dover, Kent, onboard a Border Force vessel following a small boat incident in the Channel on Saturday, March 30
A letter from housing minister Lee Rowley (pictured) to West Lindsey District Council, which contains RAF Scampton, said there are ‘potential risks to human health arising from ground gases, UXO (unexploded ordnance) and ground contamination which could affect both workers on the site and asylum seekers’
As reported by The Guardian, the letter further states, “These risks could render the site unsuitable for its proposed purpose, potentially leading to significant health impacts.”
Mr Rowley’s letter adds that mitigations are being put in to make the RAF base safe, but that in the ‘unlikely event of failure’, people at the site will be moved from the affected location.
The Home Officer also sent a letter to the council this month which said that the use of a military base could lead to trauma being triggered for some asylum seekers.
The letter said: ‘Those accommodated at the site are likely to be aware that it was formerly used as a military barracks. For some asylum seekers this association may trigger memories of past mental traumas in their home countries which is why the site is unlikely to be deemed suitable for those who are vulnerable or have serious mental health needs.’
The council is against the Home Office plans to turn RAF Scampton into accommodation for asylum seekers, saying it could endanger a future heritage scheme for the base which was the home of the Dambusters and has five Grade-II listed buildings on its grounds.
West Lindsey council said the plan to up the population in the rural area is ‘unsustainable and inappropriate’, referencing the contamination.
Worries over ‘irreversible harm… to heritage assets with archaeological interest’ were also raised by council officials.
A protest banner is seen near a protest camp outside the main gate of RAF Scampton, which was the former home of the British Red Arrows and Dambusters squadron
The entrance gate to RAF Scampton in Lincolnshire is pictured here
Home office statistics shows that there were around 46,000 asylum seekers in hotels by the end of last year at a cost of around £8million each day.
A report recently published by the National Audit Office said that housing people in RAF Scampton will cost £45.1million more than if they were to do it in hotels.
A government spokesperson said: ‘The asylum system is under unprecedented pressure, brought about by a significant increase in dangerous and illegal journeys into the country.
‘As part of the conditions of the Special Development Order for RAF Scampton, a number of surveys will be undertaken prior to occupation.
‘The safety of individuals remains our absolute priority, and we reiterate that any accommodation used in response to the increasing pressures on the UK asylum system will be fit for purpose and meet all relevant housing and health and safety rules.’
