Pam Bondi’s betrayal comes one week after Merrick Garland’s key witness in the Proud Boy trial recanted his entire testimony.

Attorney General Pam Bondi has submitted a request to dismiss a $100 million lawsuit initiated by the Proud Boys concerning their claimed political persecution following the January 6th events.

This action reflects a significant policy reversal for Trump, who had previously this year granted pardons or reduced sentences for almost all individuals targeted by the Biden administration in the aftermath of January 6th.

Eight months into Trump’s second tenure, multiple political detainees targeted under Biden have yet to receive pardons or have their sentences reduced, with some remaining incarcerated.

Bondi’s move to dismiss the Proud Boys’ suit is seen as outright betrayal by patriots and supporters of President Trump.

Bondi’s choice to adopt the Biden administration’s stance on the Proud Boys regarding their purported role in an orchestrated insurrection emerges shortly after a principal witness for the Biden DOJ against the Proud Boys withdrew his testimony, which had led to convictions and lengthy prison terms.

READ MORE: EXCLUSIVE BOMBSHELL VIDEO: KEY DOJ WITNESS SAYS BIDEN FBI THREATENED, COERCED HIM TO SECURE PROUD BOY CONVICTIONS

Leading Proud Boy Enrique Tarrio, known as @NobleOne on X, along with the “Seditious Five,” has launched a federal lawsuit in June against the federal government for what they describe as political persecution by the Biden administration after the January 6th 2021 events.

They demand $100 million in compensation for the criminal charges faced and request a jury trial to resolve the issue.

CNN reports: Proud Boys members suing Justice Department for January 6 prosecutions

The Proud Boys say that Merrick Garland’s prosecution against them was an “egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump, by any and all means necessary, legal, or illegal.”

Biden’s DOJ convicted four of the five Proud Boys of seditious conspiracy while they were deprived of a timely trial, due process, and languished in prison, despite the fact that several of them were never even accused of any violence or property damage.

Each was sentenced to a very lengthy sentence in prison before Trump ultimately delivered commutations and pardons in an ad hoc manner.

Americans increasingly feel that the Biden operatives in the FBI and DOJ who engaged in these malicious prosecutions need to be put behind bars, as Tarrio explained to Alex Jones in January.

Now, Pam Bondi is weighing in, and she’s taking the side of Biden’s DOJ, which prosecuted the Proud Boys.

The Ben Kew writes that the Proud Boys complaint argued that

their prosecutions were “an egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump, by any and all means necessary, legal, or illegal.”

Despite President Trump’s decision to offer an unconditional pardon to all involved, it appears that Pam Bondi and the Justice Department do not agree that they were victims of the Biden regime.

The Gateway Pundit was one of a few media outlets that led the way in reporting on the extensive abuse and even torture of January 6th protesters and their families, which was carried out in a systematic campaign of political persecution by Joe Biden and his Democratic allies in the Department of Justice.

Of course, this ruling comes as a shock to those who followed the Proud Boys “trial of the century” coverage at The Gateway Pundit.

The US Government set up the Proud Boys with bogus charges, used a witness who lied numerous times under oath to save his skin, and the feds even planted evidence in the Proud Boys’ social media hangout!

In fact, the Biden regime had ZERO evidence to use in court against the Proud Boys, except for government-created lies and government-coached liars.

In their filing, the DOJ claimed that plaintiffs had failed to show any evidence that investigators or prosecutors “relied on knowingly false or fabricated evidence to initiate” their cases.

“It defies ‘judicial experience and common sense’ to believe that Plaintiffs cannot make more specific allegations at this stage about what evidence was false, fabricated, or wrongfully withheld as part of their prosecution,” they wrote.

The DOJ also emphasized that a federal court had already reviewed the charges at detention hearings and determined that the “weight of the evidence is strong.”

Prosecutors pointed to “incontrovertible photo evidence of Nordean, Biggs, and Rehl inside the Capitol building,” material used “to support their arrests and detentions.”

“And while Tarrio was not at the Capitol on that day and the district court found there was no ‘smoking gun,’ the court considered Tarrio’s contrary arguments and still found the evidence of his involvement in a seditious conspiracy to be ‘very strong.’”

It will now be up to a federal judge to determine whether the lawsuit can move forward.