Over the years, I’ve delved into countless court opinions—ranging from the dry and technical to the downright confusing, with a few even managing to be entertaining. However, I must say, never before have I found myself laughing out loud while reading one. But just recently, it happened, and I couldn’t resist the urge to share the experience with you, my dear readers.
While the content of the opinion is serious, it’s about the ongoing saga involving the removal of Tren de Aragua (TdA) members under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA). Our last update discussed a Supreme Court decision, another puzzling move in the A.A.R.P. v. Trump case, delivered last Friday. As detailed in my previous coverage of the case:
The court reiterated the obligation to provide proper notice to detainees facing removal under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA). Although the court did not define what constitutes adequate notice, it did make it clear that “notice roughly 24 hours before removal, lacking details on exercising due process rights, clearly fails to meet the standard.”
