As Iran faces a wave of anti-government demonstrations and uncertainties surround Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s tenure, a crucial question arises: Who might assume control if the Islamic Republic’s current regime were to crumble?
According to specialists in regional politics and members of the Iranian opposition, the answer is anything but straightforward. The future leadership could be shaped less by ideology and more by the manner of the regime’s downfall and the cohesion or division within Iran’s security apparatus.
Collapse matters as much as succession
Behnam Ben Taleblu, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, emphasized that the pivotal factor is not just the regime’s potential collapse, but the specific circumstances surrounding it.
IRAN ON THE BRINK AS PROTESTERS MOVE TO TAKE TWO CITIES, APPEAL TO TRUMP
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is seen casting his vote in the presidential runoff election on July 5, 2024, in Tehran, Iran. (Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)
“Although he holds the title of supreme leader, it’s worth questioning how much Khamenei is directly managing the nation’s affairs, particularly after the war and given his infrequent public appearances,” Ben Taleblu explained to Fox News Digital. He cautioned Western nations against endorsing a superficial overhaul that merely reshuffles the ruling elite.
“What concerns me is the Western inclination towards a scenario similar to Venezuela under Maduro or post-revolution Egypt,” he remarked, describing situations where entrenched security forces maintain control under new governance. “Such an approach would simply rearrange leaders without offering the Iranian populace a real opportunity for transformative change.”
Ben Taleblu argued that Iran’s opposition faces a logistical challenge more than an ideological one: translating sustained street protests into organized political power before security forces reassert control.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Special forces walk on the U.S. flag during a rally commemorating International Quds Day, also known as Jerusalem Day, in Tehran, Iran, on March 28, 2025. (Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
The decisive role of security forces
Multiple experts agreed that Iran’s future hinges on whether the regime’s coercive apparatus, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the Basij militia and the regular military, remains intact.
Ben Taleblu said the key factor is whether segments of the security forces defect, refuse orders or fragment. “What has to be chipped away is the regime’s coercive power,” he said, adding that a transition would require sustained protests, economic strikes and cracks within security units.
Without that, analysts warn, Iran could see a scenario in which clerical figureheads disappear but real power remains in the hands of armed institutions.
“That’s the fear,” Ben Taleblu said. “If the state plays musical chairs, the street will not settle for it. That means a bumpier road ahead.”
Members of the Basij paramilitary force hold Iranian flag, Lebanese flag, flag of Hashd Shabi, flag of Quds force’s Fatemiyoun Brigade and flag of Lebanon’s Hezbollah, during a rally commemorating International Quds Day, also known as the Jerusalem day, in downtown Tehran, April 14, 2023. (Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Could the military take over?
Some analysts point to historical precedents, including Egypt, where the military stepped in amid unrest. Benny Sabti, an Iran expert at Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies, said a military-led transition cannot be ruled out, but would be fraught.
“IRGC generals could theoretically attempt a coup,” Sabti told Fox News Digital, stressing that Iran’s military institutions are not monolithic. He distinguished between the IRGC, which he described as an ideological and asymmetric force, and the regular army, which he said is more professional and nationally oriented.
Sabti highlighted former armed forces chief Habibollah Sayyari as an example of a figure who has voiced limited criticism from within the system. Still, he cautioned that criticism alone does not make a leader and said charisma matters deeply in Iranian politics.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) military personnel are standing at attention wearing protective face masks while an Iranian Kheibar Surface-to-Surface missile is being unveiled during the Ela Beit Al-Moghaddas (Al-Aqsa Mosque) military rally in Tehran, Iran, on November 24, 2023. The IRGC is unveiling two new missiles during the rally. (Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
“There is a problem of charisma,” Sabti said. “In Iran, it is very important.”
Political prisoners and internal leaders
Despite international attention on jailed activists, experts are skeptical that Iran’s next political leadership would emerge from within the country’s prison system.
Ben Taleblu said decades of repression have made it nearly impossible to cultivate political leadership inside Iran. “What will come from within are the forces of revolution,” he said. “Political leadership has to be built outside.”
Sabti echoed that view, saying freed prisoners would likely become part of a broader system rather than dominant leaders.
“There won’t be leaders coming out of prison,” he said. “They will be part of a new system, but not charismatic leaders.”
Iranian opposition leader Reza Pahlavi holds a press conference in Paris on June 23, 2025. (Joel Saget/AFP via Getty Images)
The exiled opposition and the Pahlavi question
Supporters of Reza Pahlavi say he is emerging as a focal point for opposition mobilization amid escalating unrest. On January 8, Pahlavi publicly called on Iranians to chant at 8 p.m. from their homes or in the streets and his aides said large crowds responded across multiple cities, including Tehran, Mashhad, Isfahan, Ahvaz and Tabriz.
Those close to Pahlavi describe him as advocating a secular, democratic Iran committed to human rights, while rejecting claims that he is seeking to restore the monarchy. Pahlavi has repeatedly said the form of Iran’s future system should be decided by the people through a free constitutional process.
“My role is not to tip the scales in favor of either monarchy or republic,” Pahlavi said. “I will remain entirely impartial in the process to help ensure that Iranians finally have the right to choose freely.”
Banafsheh Zand, an Iranian-American journalist and editor of the “Iran So Far Away” Substack, told Fox News Digital that Pahlavi is the only viable unifying figure capable of guiding a transition, a view strongly contested by others in the diaspora.
“The only person who can see this through is the crown prince,” Zand said, arguing that any prominent figure inside Iran would be swiftly eliminated by the regime. She dismissed alternative opposition figures as lacking legitimacy inside the country.
Zand said chants supporting Pahlavi during recent protests reflect genuine sentiment, not fabrication, though such claims are difficult to independently verify amid internet shutdowns and state censorship.
Some experts caution that while Pahlavi has visibility in the West and among parts of the Iranian public, he remains a polarizing figure, particularly among Iranians wary of monarchy or external influence.
Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo meets Maryam Rajav at Ashraf-3 – May 16, 2022, in Albania. (NCRI)
Rajavi and organized opposition groups
Another long-standing opposition movement, the Mujahedin-e Khalq, led by Maryam Rajavi, has received backing from some senior U.S. political figures from across the aisle over the years, including former Vice President Mike Pence, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Rudy Giuliani.
In a statement to Fox News Digital, Rajavi said change “will not come from outside Iran, nor will it be delivered by the will of foreign capitals,” arguing that only an organized, nationwide resistance can overthrow the Islamic Republic.
Rajavi pointed to the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran and its “Resistance Units” as the core force behind recent uprisings, claiming they have played a decisive role in organizing protests and confronting security forces at the cost of heavy casualties. She said the National Council of Resistance of Iran does not seek power for itself, but instead proposes a six-month provisional period following the regime’s overthrow, culminating in free elections for a constituent assembly to draft a new constitution for a democratic, secular republic.
NCRI President-elect Maryam Rajavi stands with former Vice President Mike Pence. (NCRI )
“Once established, all authority will be transferred to that Assembly, which will both select the provisional government and draft the constitution of the new republic,” Rajavi said. “Gender equality in all its facets, the separation of religion and state, autonomy for Iranian Kurdistan and many other urgent matters have been ratified in detail by the NCRI.”
Rajavi also cited what she described as broad international backing for the NCRI’s platform. Critics and analysts interviewed by Fox News Digital dispute the group’s level of support inside Iran. Sabti said the MEK’s history of violence in the 1980s and its rigid ideology have alienated younger Iranians.
Speaking to an NCRI conference in Washington, D.C., last November, Pompeo pushed back against critics, stating “A thriving, democratic, popular government in Iran—not a theocracy, not a monarchy, not an oppressive regime. This will be a great thing for the entire world. We are waiting for that day, and it will be a blessing to us all.”
Ben Taleblu also warned against Western governments “playing favorites” among exiled factions, saying legitimacy must ultimately come from inside Iran.
Protesters gather as vehicles burn, amid evolving anti-government unrest, in Tehran, Iran, in this screen grab obtained from a social media video released on Jan. 9, 2026. (Social Media/via Reuters)
No clear successor and a long road ahead
Despite intense speculation, experts agreed on one point: there is no clear successor waiting in the wings.
“We are not there yet,” Sabti said, noting that Khamenei remains alive, and the security forces have not fractured.
Ben Taleblu described the moment as a marathon rather than a sprint, warning against simplistic narratives about regime collapse.
“This is about getting the best bridgehead to a post-Islamic Republic Iran,” he said, “so that the forces of revolution inside can finally become voters and choose their own fate.”
