Frustrated New Yorkers told City Council members Tuesday that Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s rocky launch of the new pied-à-terre tax has left property owners confused, anxious and, in some cases, feeling as though City Hall has put them personally in its sights.
About 30 homeowners and real estate professionals testified during a three-hour oversight hearing, giving council lawmakers plenty of ammunition as they sought answers from the Mamdani administration — which did not attend the session.
Among those who spoke was Robert Bertagna, a retired Upper East Side resident who said he has lived in his home for three decades. He told lawmakers he received a notice from the city Department of Finance warning that he could owe $52,000 a year under the surcharge unless he applied for and won an exemption.
“This is my primary residence. I pay taxes in New York. I vote in New York. My driver’s license in New York. There’s plenty of records to establish the fact that I’m a resident of New York,” he told the council.
“This is a clear intrusion by our government, intimidation by our government and, frankly, a direct attack and a target on private wealth,” he said. “I filed an exemption, but that’s not the point. The point is the government is assuming that I’m guilty unless I can prove myself to be innocent.”
The pied-à-terre tax is intended to apply only to high-end second homes in New York City, but even residents who said they support the concept argued that the Mamdani administration’s rollout has been muddled and has created a host of practical concerns.
New Yorker Kyle Braff told the council that a friend who bought a brownstone four decades ago recently reached out in a panic, wondering whether he might now be caught by the tax because the home’s value has likely climbed above the $5 million threshold.
Braff said the friend, who retired to the South for better weather and to make his savings last longer, held onto the brownstone so he could remain close to his children and grandchildren — and now fears that decision could trigger the city’s pied-à-terre surcharge.
“I want to be clear that any legislation that’s proposed to hold the wealthy accountable to their fair share is a good thing,” he also said, adding the rollout has been “unclear.”
The pied-à-terre tax applies to one- to three-family homes worth at least $5 million and co-ops and condominiums valued at $1 million or more that are unoccupied, non-primary residences, under the law approved by state lawmakers and Gov. Kathy Hochul in the spring.
But representatives of co-op groups warned the process for them was punitive — as the DOF will be sending the surcharge bill directly to cooperative boards or corporations, no individual shareholders.
“The smaller the building, the larger the portion of the non-residents’ tax that each resident shareholder will have to find a way to pay,” said Mary Ann Rothman, executive director of the Council of York Cooperatives and Condominiums. “Where is the justice and jeopardizing the financial stability of a cooperative in this way?”
The hearing drew competing rallies beforehand from supporters and skeptics alike, even as City Hall officials were no-shows, blaming the ongoing high-profile lawsuit seeking to halt the rollout.
DOF Director Richard Lee, who submitted written testimony in lieu of taking tough questions, defended the launch — arguing the 17,000 notices that went out to homeowners simply informed them they could be hit with the levy.
“Property owners who believe their property should not be subject to the surcharge have an opportunity to submit proof the property is used as a primary residence,” his statement said.
MORE STORY: Lost Devon Battlefield Where Anglo-Saxons Crushed Vikings Found
But Kenneth Fishel, a longtime Upper East Side resident who just joined the lawsuit by homeowners aggrieved by the tax rollout, contended he only found out about his notice by accident. His neighbor, who lives nearly 30 stories below him, received the notice instead, he said.
“My apartment number was listed on it, and it said that I didn’t live in that apartment and that I owed $58,000 for non-primary residence tax,” Fishel, who testified at the hearing, told The Post after.
“If I hadn’t run into him in the elevator, I never would have known, and I would have been billed for the full tax.”
A not-so-ragtag group of nearly 20 real estate agents also gathered on City Hall’s steps ahead of the hearing, holding signs declaring “Guilty until proven resident” and “Dox you very much.”
Jason Haber, president of the New York Residential Agent Continuum, railed against the administration’s public release of a tax roll of 900,000 properties that could fall under the levy — saying it amounted to mass doxxing.
“Today we’re here to say we are in the dox days of August,” he said. “That is a gift to every scammer, fraudster, or person with bad intent out there.”
Lee, the finance honcho, said the city publishes tax rolls each year and that it was required under the law.
Not everyone was sympathetic.
The city’s Democratic Socialists of America chapter sarcastically scoffed that “those who claim mansions or luxury condos as their primary residences” are complaining about uploading proof of residency to a city website.
“But, as anyone who has ever received unemployment insurance or SNAP benefits would know, working class New Yorkers have to do a lot more than prove residency in order to receive basic public benefits,” the group posted on X. “So why all this fuss over uploading a PDF?
“It’s because the oligarch class doesn’t feel any obligation to the city that they play in, even though it’s working New Yorkers’ city to live in. So today and every day, we’ll keep fighting for the pied-à-terre tax and for more taxes on the rich to fund a dignified life for all.”
Jennifer Goodman, a spokesperson for Hochul, declined to weigh in on whether or not City Hall needed to pause the rollout.
Hochul’s reps argued the law includes tools for the city to directly enforce collections from co-op unit owners.
They referred The Post to the governor’s comments last week distancing herself from the “tax the rich” scheme she gave to Mamdani in this year’s state budget negotiations.
“We’re not responsible for the rollout,” Hochul said.
“We just were their — we are the facilitators.”
— Additional reporting by Vaughn Golden
