A Texas wedding venue refused to refund nearly $16,000 paid by a couple after the groom-to-be died suddenly, suggesting instead that the money could be used for another celebration in the future.
The dispute began after 25-year-old Diego Hernandez died unexpectedly in April, just seven months before he was scheduled to marry his fiancée at Posey Meadows, a picturesque countryside venue outside San Marcos, southwest of Austin.
Rather than return the $15,909.28 the couple had paid, the venue initially proposed several alternatives. The reservation could be moved to a later date, or the funds could be applied to an entirely different event.
When Hernandez’s family continued to seek a refund, the disagreement turned into a bitter legal dispute. Posey Meadows ultimately filed a countersuit against the woman whose wedding plans had been destroyed by the tragedy.
The venue has now reversed course, dropping its counterclaim and agreeing to refund the full amount. The decision came only after the case attracted widespread negative publicity.
The dramatic change followed public criticism from Hernandez’s grieving mother, Lucy Hernandez, who condemned the venue’s handling of the case.
‘Where are their morals? Where are their moral principles?’ she asked KSAT.
‘We don’t have a fight in us. We don’t. We’re emotionally drained. This is just weighing heavily.’
Hernandez and his fiancée had planned to exchange vows on November 20 at Posey Meadows, a wedding venue surrounded by the rolling countryside of Hays County.
Diego Hernandez is pictured proposing to his fiancée before his sudden death at age 25. The couple had been scheduled to marry in November, but their wedding plans ended in tragedy
Diego Hernandez, 25, died unexpectedly in April, seven months before his planned wedding. His grieving fiancée was then drawn into a legal dispute over nearly $16,000 paid for the ceremony
Their plans ended tragically when Hernandez died in late April, leaving his fiancée to mourn the man she had expected to spend the rest of her life with.
His family contacted the venue to explain that the wedding could no longer go ahead and asked for the substantial payment already made to be returned.
Instead, venue owner Julie Campbell presented the family with several alternatives.
She proposed transferring the booking to another date or applying the money toward a different type of gathering.
Campbell also said that some of the payment might be refunded if the venue found another customer to book the couple’s original wedding date.
For Hernandez’s grieving relatives, the suggestions intensified an already painful situation and provided little comfort.
His mother said she had initially believed the matter could be settled through a simple phone call.
‘I’m very surprised,’ she told KSAT. ‘I honestly felt that it wasn’t going to go past a phone call.’
Posey Meadows, a picturesque wedding venue outside San Marcos, Texas, initially refused to refund the couple’s $15,909.28 payment
Diego’s heartbroken mother, Lucy Hernandez, spoke out against the venue’s handling of the dispute, questioning its ‘morals’ and ‘moral principles’
Instead, she described a particularly distressing exchange with Campbell in early May, shortly before she was due to see her son’s body for the final time.
According to Lucy, the discussion became heated and ended with Campbell telling her the wedding payments would not be returned.
The confrontation added another painful burden to a family already struggling with an unimaginable loss.
‘I’ve planned other funerals. I’ve lost my mom and my dad and a brother, but planning a son’s funeral is very different,’ Lucy said. ‘It weighs very different.’
KEEP READING: Serial Killer’s Ex-Wife Says She Never Suspected His Double Life During Eight-Year Marriage
By late June, the disagreement had become serious enough for an attorney representing Hernandez’s fiancée to send the venue a formal demand for repayment.
When that failed to resolve the dispute, the woman filed a lawsuit in Hays County district court in late July.
Her legal complaint accused Posey Meadows of securing an ‘unjust and ghoulish windfall built on a young man’s death.’
But the venue responded with legal action of its own.
Posey Meadows filed a counterclaim alleging that the bride-to-be had breached the wedding contract by seeking to recover the money already paid while refusing to hand over the remaining balance.
The contract stipulated that payments would be forfeited in the event of cancellation.
It did not contain any specific provision addressing what would happen if either member of the couple died before the wedding.
The venue also raised questions about whether Hernandez’s death had been adequately documented.
In its counterclaim, Posey Meadows alleged that the family had failed to supply proof of his passing.
The business initially suggested the money could be used toward a future booking or another event rather than refund the deposits which. had already been made
On Facebook many people appeared to have left negative reviews highlighting the story
The family say they offered to provide a death certificate before litigation began but received no response from the venue’s legal representatives.
As the controversy attracted mounting attention, Posey Meadows insisted it had been attempting to resolve the situation compassionately.
In an October 16 statement, the business said it had previously granted full refunds to families facing similar tragedies, regardless of the terms of their contracts.
‘Our company was heartbroken to learn of a private and tragic situation involving a couple scheduled to be married at our wedding venue,’ it said.
The business maintained that it was already working toward a refund when the lawsuit arrived, adding that litigation had complicated the process.
On Wednesday, an attorney for the bride-to-be confirmed that she would be receiving a full refund.
In a lengthy statement, Posey Meadows defended its handling of the dispute, saying it had sought official confirmation of Hernandez’s death before making an exception to its cancellation policy.
‘Our thoughts continue to be with Diego’s family and loved ones, and we extend our deepest condolences,’ the venue said.
It claimed the family had been asked for a death certificate in early May but that the document did not arrive until mid-August, after legal proceedings had begun.
While waiting, the business said it had searched for an obituary, funeral announcement or other publicly available confirmation of his death.
‘Our efforts were never meant to diminish the family’s loss,’ the statement continued.
‘We regret that the litigation process has complicated what we hoped would be a speedy and compassionate resolution.’
The venue also confirmed it was no longer seeking additional money from the grieving woman.
