Blake Lively tells women 'find a husband you can share clothes with'

Blake Lively has dipped into husband Ryan Reynolds’s wardrobe more than once—and over the weekend, she returned to the closet she knows best.

The 39-year-old actress shared a mirror selfie on Instagram Stories wearing Reynolds’s pale blue Thom Browne button-down shirt, complete with embroidered geese and greenery.

“Find a husband you can share clothes with,” Lively captioned the image.

The Gossip Girl alum, whose alcohol brand recently suffered a major setback, styled the shirt with straight-leg jeans, a navy bandana and loafers. She also carried what she called a “fab vintage bag”—adding in the corner of the photo that the accessory was “not his.”

The fashion-forward shirt originally sold for $990, but Lively’s vintage blue denim Hermès Kelly bag is worth considerably more. A similar bag fetched $23,000 at Sotheby’s, according to Page Six.

This is far from the first time Lively has borrowed from the 50-year-old actor’s wardrobe for her own style—or her work.

Blake Lively posted an Instagram Stories mirror selfie wearing husband Ryan Reynolds's light-blue embroidered Thom Browen button-down shirt, writing: 'Find a husband who you can share clothes with'

Blake Lively shared an Instagram Stories mirror selfie in Ryan Reynolds’s pale blue embroidered Thom Browne shirt, writing: “Find a husband who you can share clothes with.”

The 39-year-old has raided Reynolds's closet on several other occasions. Above, Lively and Reynolds in 2025

The 39-year-old actress has borrowed from Reynolds’s closet on several occasions. Above, Lively and Reynolds pictured in 2025.

For her role as Lily Bloom in the 2024 romantic drama It Ends with Us, Lively worked several of Reynolds’s shirts and pairs of socks into the character’s wardrobe. She also borrowed pieces from her friend Gigi Hadid.

“A lot of it’s my real-life clothes or my husband’s clothes or my girlfriend Gigi’s clothes. I was borrowing some,” she explained on Today in 2024.

“It’s like a wedding—something old, something borrowed, something blue or something new,” she added.

Lively stands 5 feet 8 inches tall, several inches shorter than Reynolds, who is 6 feet 2 inches. Still, she appears to have mastered the art of making his clothes work for her.

Her latest fashion post comes months after she reached a settlement in her legal dispute with It Ends with Us co-star and director Justin Baldoni.

The settlement was announced on May 4, just two weeks before the case was scheduled to go to trial.

The following day, Lively made a surprise appearance at the Met Gala in a vintage Spring 2006 Atelier Versace gown—an appearance that seemed designed to project confidence and show she was not retreating from public view.

Lively has also been awarded $407,451.75 in legal fees and costs related to Baldoni’s countersuit.

At five-foot-eight, Lively is a few inches shy of Reynolds's six-foot-two and smaller in stature, but she clearly makes it work. Above, the couple in 2025

Lively is 5 feet 8 inches tall, while Reynolds stands 6 feet 2 inches, but she clearly knows how to pull off his clothes. The couple are pictured in 2025.

Lively incorporated several of her husband's shirts and socks into her character Lily Bloom's wardrobe for the 2024 romance-drama It Ends with Us (Source: @blakelively Instagram)

Lively used several of Reynolds’s shirts and pairs of socks for Lily Bloom’s wardrobe in the 2024 romance drama It Ends with Us. (Source: @blakelively Instagram)

Blake Lively Tells Women to Find Husbands Who Share Clothes

“It’s like a wedding—something old, something borrowed, something blue or something new,” Lively said of using clothes from her own closet and those of friends. Above, Lively appears with Justin Baldoni in a scene from It Ends with Us.

Lively had originally sought $8,035,040.88 in fees for defending herself against the defamation countersuit filed by Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios.

U.S. District Judge Lewis J. Liman ultimately ruled that she could not recover expenses for the litigation in its entirety.

Instead, the judge determined that Lively was entitled to reasonable fees and costs tied specifically to defending against Baldoni’s defamation claim.

“The number of hours for which Lively seeks reimbursement is unreasonable,” Liman wrote in an order dated August 26, according to People.

“Media relations were not integral to defending the defamation claim brought against Lively. Accordingly, time spent on media relations and press coverage is not compensable.”

Lively’s attorneys, Esra Hudson and Michael Gottlieb, characterized the decision as a victory and called the ruling “historic.”

In a statement to People, they said: “This first-ever award of fees and costs under this California law is historic, and demonstrates that there are real consequences of bringing retaliatory lawsuits.

“As we have said from day one, Blake Lively’s case was never about money—it was about accountability.”

Lively's recent social media share comes months after she settled her legal dispute with It Ends with Us costar and director Baldoni; Above, Lively in NYC on February 11

Lively’s latest social media post comes months after she settled her legal dispute with It Ends with Us co-star and director Justin Baldoni. Above, Lively in New York City on February 11.

In August, a judge ordered Baldoni and his production company, Wayfarer Studios, to pay Lively $407,451.75 in attorney fees and court costs. Above, Baldoni on February 11

In August, a judge ordered Baldoni and his production company, Wayfarer Studios, to pay Lively $407,451.75 in attorney fees and court costs. Above, Baldoni on February 11.

Bryan Freedman, the attorney representing Baldoni and Wayfarer, took a different view, saying the ruling “speaks for itself.”

Freedman later called the outcome a “significant victory for my clients” that “sends a clear message.”

“Judge Liman clearly considered the ‘outrageous and unreasonable’ $8 million-plus demand and, in rejecting it, awarded only five percent of the amount sought in legal fees and costs,” Freedman said.

“The ruling is a significant victory for my clients and sends a clear message that, no matter how powerful you may be, the courtroom is not a place to take advantage of the law for your own personal gain.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Charlie Kirk murder suspect set to learn trial start date

The man accused of killing Charlie Kirk is expected to learn Monday…

Claims Tied to Meghan Markle’s Father Put Focus on Sex Tourism

Two resort destinations on opposite sides of the world have long faced…

Midterms Survey Reveals Why Trump’s GOP Fell Short in 2022

Less than a week after the Republican Party suffered its most severe…

Trump Outlines His Agenda for the Rest of His Presidency

President Donald Trump said he is preparing to make additional changes to…

Qantas to Cut 850+ Jobs in India Under Major Cost-Saving Plan

Qantas is set to eliminate more than 850 jobs over the next…

Katie Zacharia Denies Rumors She’s Seeking Her Former Job Again

Katie Zacharia has rejected claims that she was trying to win back…

NFL Star Josh Jacobs to Miss More Action Following Arrest

Green Bay Packers running back Josh Jacobs is facing an indefinite absence…

Photos Show Alleged Chinese Spy Flaunting Relationship With Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang

Freshly surfaced photographs appear to show Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang alongside…

California Voters Reject Billionaire Tax in Blow to Progressives

California voters have rejected a controversial proposal that would have created the…

Trump Stokes Voter Fraud Fears in Fiery Post-Election Rant

President Donald Trump cast doubt on the midterm election results Monday, just…

Mother of 16 in ‘House of Horrors’ Case Is Pregnant

Elizabeth Siders, the Ohio mother of 16 children found living in appalling…

Texas $1.5M Property Fraud Case Sparks Warning for Homeowners

Property investment can generate significant wealth, but owners are being warned about…