Halyna Hutchins and Alec Baldwin

Family of slain “Rust” cinematographer Halyna Hutchins announced, by way of their lawyers, that no fewer than 15 industry safety standards were ignored on the set of the Alec Baldwin-produced Western last year before the fatal shot that took her life.

“Today we filed a wrongful death case on their behalf in Santa Fe,” attorney Brian Panish said during a press conference, saying the lawsuit names “Alec Baldwin and others who were responsible for the safety on the set and whose reckless behavior and cost-cutting led to the senseless and tragic death of Halyna Hutchins.”

“I think it’s clear,” Panish said in response to a technical question about what actually caused the discharge of the weapon that day. “Alec had the gun in his hand, he shot it, Halyna was killed.”

The victim’s estate announced its intention to pursue litigation against Baldwin and the other producers late last month.

The complaint obtained by Law&Crime singles out the A-list actor by name as well as 24 other named defendants and up to 100 unnamed parties allegedly responsible for Hutchins’ tragic death:

Defendant Baldwin was sitting on a church pew at the Bonanza Creek location, approximately four feet away from multiple members of the crew of Rust, when he reached across his body and used his right hand to grab the revolver holstered on his left side, drew the revolver with a “cross draw” movement across his body and aimed it directly at Ms. Hutchins while drawing back the hammer on the revolver. He released the revolver’s hammer, and – BAM – Defendant Baldwin fired the revolver. The live bullet discharged from Defendant Baldwin’s revolver struck Ms. Hutchins in the side of her chest, ricocheted through her body, causing grievous injury, and exited Ms. Hutchins’ body with sufficient force to strike director Joel Souza in the shoulder and pass almost entirely through his body. Ms. Hutchins endured enormous pain and suffering and died from her wounds.

“Alec Baldwin and others were responsible and are responsible,” Panish reiterated time and time again during the press conference–which featured a nearly 10-minute-long animated video that outlines the major points of the arguments contained in the lawsuit.

“The morning that Halyna Hutchins was shot and killed, tensions among the crew and cast regarding safety on the ‘Rust’ set had boiled over,” the narrator alleges. “The crew had warned the production that the set was ‘super unsafe’ and that safety was a massive issue.”

As the allegations, also in caption form, scroll across over the dramatized, animated version of the fatal incident, the video also shows a series of text messages and emails purportedly raised by the workers on the ill-fated set about those myriad safety concerns.

“After the warning of the unsafe production, the workers that had complained quit in protest of the safety conditions,” the narration/caption continues. “The producers directed the ‘super unsafe’ production to continue.”

The video and lawsuit also directly faults Baldwin.

“Mr. Baldwin and the Rust crew and cast committed major breaches of industry safety protocols, as developed and written by the Industry Wide Labor-Management Safety Committee and other industry organizations,” the narration goes on before describing the circumstances immediately prior to the shooting as a “line up.”

The lawsuit describes that film industry term:

The sole purpose of a line up for this scene was to confirm the positioning, frame and focus of the camera for a close-up shot of Defendant Baldwin’s hand and the revolver he was holding, but Defendant Baldwin’s possession of a real revolver, let al one a revolver loaded with any ammunition at all, was unnecessary to achieve this purpose. The scene in question did not even call for the revolver held by Defendant Baldwin to be fired.

“Industry standards required Mr. Baldwin to use a replica or rubber prop gun whenever possible,” the video goes on. “It was unnecessary for Mr. Baldwin to use the revolver for a line up. Industry standards required Mr. Baldwin, as a producer and lead actor, to accept the revolver directly from or in the presence of the production’s armorer. Mr. Baldwin did not accept the revolver from the armorer. The armorer was not even in the same room.”

During the press conference, the family’s attorneys were clear that the Hutchins estate believes Baldwin should have known better than to “play cowboy” with a live gun on the set of a Hollywood production.

“There are many people culpable but Mr. Baldwin was the person holding the weapon,” Panish said.

When asked what he hoped the lawsuit would accomplish, the lead attorney noted that the incident left an entire family grieving.

“To hold the people accountable who are responsible,” Panish replied. “And to seek compensation, just and fair” for Hutchins’ surviving husband and son.

“We need to hold the people fully responsible who engaged in this cost-cutting,” he added.

In response to a question from a reporter about whether any particular piece of evidence stod out as potentially more influential than the other, the attorney demurred.

“The totality of it is just overwhelming,” he said.

Law&Crime reached out to a representative of Baldwin’s for comment.

Read the lawsuit in full below:

[images: Halyna Hutchins provided by her family via their attorneys; Alec Baldwin via Mark Sagliocco/Getty Images for National Geographic]

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Source: This post first appeared on