Leaked White House Blacklist Reveals the “Worst” Influencers Targeted by Insiders

A network of MAGA influencers that once united behind President Donald Trump’s push to reclaim the White House is now being strained by growing distrust.

Not long ago, many of these right-wing social media figures regularly boosted one another’s posts as part of a shared effort to help return Trump to the Oval Office. But people inside that digital orbit told the Daily Mail that several prominent voices in the MAGA ecosystem have since become increasingly wary of one another, questioning the motives behind what gets posted and why.

Attempts to recruit these personalities — often with financial perks attached — have been a feature of the movement for years. In Trump’s second term, however, the paid-influence business has surged dramatically.

According to sources who spoke to the Daily Mail, some influencers are now willing to push a message to their audiences of millions or even help secure access to the president in exchange for substantial payments.

In this environment, legal boundaries and ethical standards often appear difficult to separate. Allegations are common, while meaningful oversight remains limited, even with federal rules designed to regulate such conduct.

The White House has reportedly begun paying attention and has put together a private “blacklist” naming some of the figures viewed most negatively.

‘I just have utter contempt for them, there’s a whole group of them, they share business, they refer each other, they inflate their connections, and they travel in packs,’ a source close to the White House told the Daily Mail. 

‘Some have made it their entire identity.’ 

The White House closely tracks signs of paid influence, particularly when it targets the president.

When Trump announced a potential peace deal with Iran in May, several prominent influencers immediately attacked him online for conceding to Tehran – despite no details of the deal having been released. It raised alarm bells in the West Wing and has become all too familiar, Trump operatives revealed. 

In September, an unusual social media campaign saw influencers blast Trump’s tariffs on India as misguided. Another was exposed for attacking the administration’s push to stop food stamp recipients buying soda with their benefits. 

It was flagged by online MAGA ally Nick Sortor, who shared screenshots of payment offers made on behalf of the soda industry.

Among the alleged worst actors, according to a source close to the White House, are CJ Pearson, Rob Smith, Arynne Wexler, Emily Wilson (known as Emily Saves America) and Students for Trump co-founder Ryan Fournier – all one-time stars of the MAGA influencer world.

Some influencers claiming to work with the White House have contacted tech companies directly, inflating their connections to the president and his advisers. Others demand personal access to Trump in exchange for political favors.

White House digital staffers are exhausted by the drama, sources told the Daily Mail, noting that interactions can become toxic. 

After Trump’s 2024 reelection win, political consultants built MAGA ‘influence farms,’ recruiting top viral accounts to push political messaging for profit.

The result, people familiar with influencer farms say, is some puzzling posts and endorsements.

Former Trump digital strategist Brad Parscale – once hailed as the tech genius behind Trump’s 2016 win – is connected to several influencer firms, including Influenceable, which works with the Daily Wire, Paramount and Angel Studios to boost interest in their content.

The pitch to influencers: share only the messaging you agree with, and get paid for it.

‘You’ve been doing this for free for so long, why not get paid to do something you love?’ one influencer familiar with recruiting strategies explained.

Sources in the industry told the Daily Mail that Fournier has a record of approaching influencers with proposals to share content for cash payments. Fournier declined a Daily Mail request for comment. 

The tells are familiar. An influencer suddenly emerges as an expert on an obscure political issue, armed with specific talking points. Or a pile-on: one person attacks a brand or individual, and similar images, videos and talking points immediately follow.

One suspected paid pile-on, sources told the Daily Mail, saw influencers call Harley-Davidson as ‘woke’ and ‘gay’ while praising Indian Motorcycle as an authentic company embodying American values. 

The campaign seemed too coordinated to be organic, sources say, as prominent figures on the right suddenly developed very strong opinions about motorcycles.

‘Indian Motorcycle gets it. 125 years. Zero agenda. Built in America,’ Emily Wilson posted on X alongside a video praising the company. Indian had recently hired Noise Media, an influencer firm connected to Parscale.

Prominent influencers ridiculed the ham-handed campaign, but the stakes are rising as accusations of paid foreign influence spread through the community.

Wilson responded sharply to claims she was paid by foreign interests: ‘Who pays me? I’m independent. Very easy to prove where my money comes from literally my brand deals I post. Nice try b***h,’ she wrote to one critic. 

She did not respond to the Daily Mail’s request for comment.

One influencer joked darkly that DC political consultants gossip daily about who is feeding information to or paying conservative activist Laura Loomer, whose unusual ‘scoops’ targeting powerful political and business interests sit alongside her frequent pro-Israel posts.

Loomer denied receiving payment for posts, telling the Daily Mail she has never been identified as a paid influencer for Israeli interests and simply shares her own views.

‘How does supporting Israel, like being in support of Israel’s right to defend itself, make me a foreign agent? I don’t take money from foreign governments,’ she said.

Loomer frequently brands critics of Israel as paid shills for Qatar.

Loomer has also questioned why Trump won’t take more drastic military action against Iran, criticizing his pursuit of a peace deal. 

‘I support the President, and I completely respect President Trump, but I don’t agree that you can negotiate with Islamic terrorists,’ she told the Daily Mail. 

Bruesewitz fired off several messages on social media on Thursday flagging online behavior suggesting that people opposed to President Trump’s deal with Iran were getting paid by outside firms paid by the Israeli government.

‘If someone is acting as an agent of a foreign government by coordinating efforts to influence U.S. officials or shape American public opinion, they are generally required to register and disclose that relationship under the Foreign Agents Registration Act,’ he said.

Last month, Bruesewitz publicly warned influencers he was tracking their online attacks against the president. 

‘We are aware of multiple foreign influencer campaigns and are actively tracking both the intermediary companies receiving these funds as pass-throughs and the influencers who are failing to disclose their compensation,’ he wrote. ‘We need far stricter disclosure laws for foreign influencer marketing ops.’

Bruesewitz told the Daily Mail he was not questioning Loomer, but other voices who appeared to be coordinating criticism of the president.

GOP Rep Anna Paulina Luna of Florida took notice. ‘I have confirmed this is true, and there are receipts,’ she replied on X, announcing that she would soon introduce legislation to regulate influencer transparency.

But some MAGA influencers felt Bruesewitz was the last person who should be raising the alarm, pointing to his travel to countries including Qatar.

Comedian Arynne Wexler fired back, telling her followers Bruesewitz should have ‘no place’ leading any investigation into foreign influence.

‘I want a full investigation, not one buried by a Qatari whore,’ she wrote on X, adding: ‘I have received zero dollars from foreign governments. Can you say the same?’

Bruesewitz told the Daily Mail he had visited Qatar twice: once as an invited speaker at the 2025 Doha Forum, where Bill Gates, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Jr also spoke, and once to attend the Formula 1 Qatar Grand Prix. 

He denied receiving any payment from the Qatari government or Qatari interests, and took no speaking fees.

Foreign countries have long invited influencers from both right and left on travel junkets to experience the best of their nations. 

The travel is usually paid for, but influencers are typically not required to post favorable coverage. Fawning reviews from sponsored trips, however, have raised suspicions that some deals involve more of an exchange.

‘I wasn’t aware of a great deal of things about Qatar, only misperceptions and half-truths I’d read about online,’ influencer Rob Smith posted in a glowing review while visiting the country on a junket. Smith did not return a request for comment.

Israel is also ramping up influencer travel as part of a government-wide push to improve its public image. ‘I’ve been offered countless trips to Israel,’ one MAGA influencer told the Daily Mail, saying he turned them all down. 

Other consultants and influencers say they have likewise declined lucrative offers from foreign interests.

But not everyone is passing.

Parscale’s firm has already received $15 million from Havas Media Network, an international media company working on behalf of the Israeli state, and is expected to receive a further $4.5 million a month between April 1 and October 31, a total of $46.5 million, according to FARA documents.

Parscale did not return a request for comment.

Influencer CJ Pearson has registered as a foreign agent representing the Bahamas, but denies posting content to support foreign interests.

‘CJ is not paid to post for or against any foreign nation,’ a spokesman told the Daily Mail, describing his work for the Bahamas as fully disclosed. ‘As a proud American, CJ follows the law. Therefore, in compliance with FARA, he registered.’

Under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, individuals acting in an advocacy capacity must disclose their ties to foreign interests. 

Those filings have left the influencer community fully aware of paid campaigns to support Israel: an October FARA filing revealed the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs allocating up to $900,000 to communications firm Bridges Partners for the ‘Esther Project,’ a campaign to post pro-Israel content.

But while the third-party firms that recruit influencers are disclosed, the identities of the influencers they pay are not – a widely understood loophole.

‘You’re not getting a check directly from Qatar or the state of Israel, but through intermediaries that give you plausible deniability,’ one influencer said.

Efforts by countries like Russia, China, Qatar, Turkey and Iran, influencers say, are more subversive still and don’t play by the rules.

Wexler told the Daily Mail that Qatar – not Israel – is the worst actor in the space. ‘Qatari money is everything they claim Jewish money is,’ she said. ‘I don’t take money from Israel, I donate to Israel.’

The opacity has blown up into a full-scale war, with rival influencers insisting their ideological opponents are paid shills for foreign powers. That leaves pro-Israel voices at a particular disadvantage: even authentic support for Israel and its wars in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran is now viewed with suspicion online.

And the campaigns are getting harder to spot. Some firms now recruit political figures already aligned on an issue and pay them to craft their own messaging – no scripted talking points required.

Many in the community have publicly called for reform or pitched policy fixes to members of Congress. Luna’s bill will be the first to address the issue, but other members are weighing hearings and legislation of their own, sources told the Daily Mail.

‘I want all foreign influencer campaigns to end,’ Bruesewitz said. ‘If Qatar is doing it I want it to stop, if Israel is doing it I want it to stop, if India, Russia, China is doing it, I want it to stop, that’s my position.’

Until then, suspicions and accusations will keep flying over whether one-time friends and allies can be trusted – or whether they are bought and paid for.