The tragic death of 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska in Charlotte, allegedly at the hands of a recently released repeat offender, is intensifying the national debate over judicial decisions that allow potentially dangerous individuals back into the community.

While critics claim that judges are excessively lenient, New York City trial attorney Nicole Brenecki emphasizes the complexity of the issue.

“It’s not just a matter of public perception,” Brenecki explained to Fox News Digital. “Statistics clearly show an increase in repeat offenses. Recidivism rates have reached unprecedented levels.”

Authorities have released a mugshot of Decarlos Brown, alongside surveillance footage reportedly capturing him on a light rail train before the alleged murder of Iryna Zarutska. (Mecklenburg County Sheriff’s Office; CATS)

Brenecki highlighted that the period immediately following an individual’s release from jail or prison is particularly critical, as many face unstable housing, employment challenges, and lack of essential resources. Moreover, she noted the mounting pressure on courts to expedite cases due to overwhelming caseloads.

“There is a discernible shift towards leniency,” she remarked. “This trend is under scrutiny because we see the repercussions—these individuals often reoffend, putting public safety at risk.”

A view of the memorial dedicated to slain 23-year-old Ukrainian Iryna Zarutska at the East/West Blvd light rail station in Charlotte, N.C., on Sept. 11, 2025. (Peter Zay/Anadolu via Getty Images)

The suspect in Zarutska’s killing, Decarlos Brown Jr., allegedly attacked and stabbed her to death while the young Ukrainian refugee was commuting home from her pizzeria job in August.

Brown had a history of violent crime, including assaults and robberies, and had also been diagnosed with schizophrenia. Yet he was still free and walking the streets.

Brenecki said that judges often face public backlash in such cases like Zarutska’s, but many misunderstand the legal constraints in place.

Attorney Nicole Brenecki said that not all arrests result in convictions, but that repeated arrests still signal a clear pattern of dangerous behavior. (FILE PHOTO/JaysonPhotography)

“This is a very, very difficult subject because we have this term ‘judicial discretion,’” she said. “When it comes to the release or bail, it’s all discretionary. There are risk assessment factors they’re supposed to be looking at, but mistakes are made.”

She said that judges are required to strike a balance between maintaining the presumption of innocence for the accused and ensuring public safety. But even so, some decisions defy common sense.

“When you see the articles in the media saying people were released, and they had, I don’t know, 70 prior arrests, there is a red flag there,” she said. “For some reason, it is not being brought to attention at the time of the sentencing or release.”

She noted that not all arrests result in convictions, but that repeated arrests still signal a clear pattern of dangerous behavior.

“Arrest does not always lead to a conviction, but the arrest is usually based on some act,” she said. “So even if this person finds themselves perpetually in those types of situations that lead to arrests, it’s somewhat of a red flag.”

WATCH: Chicago train attack revives debate on cashless bail for repeat offenders

Brenecki said that part of the problem is that judges are influenced, consciously or not, by political and social pressures for deincarceration.

“I don’t think judges should be looking at the state of society and saying, ‘Oh, perhaps we should be doing better as a nation in terms of curbing poverty,’” she said. “This is not a judge’s place to make those considerations and have them outweigh public safety.”

“If I were to sum up everything, I think it’s the failure of the judicial system and the court system and the court system more than anything else,” she said.