NY judge blocks some Luigi Mangione backpack evidence
The murder trial of Luigi Mangione has taken a significant turn as a New York State Supreme Court Justice has decided to suppress certain evidence found in his backpack. Items such as a magazine and a computer chip have been deemed inadmissible, as the judge concluded that the backpack was not within Mangione’s “immediate grabbable area” during a search conducted by Altoona Police. However, crucial pieces of evidence, including a gun, silencer, and a notebook manifesto, remain valid in the trial concerning the homicide of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
The ruling has reignited debates around New York’s criminal justice system, with critics arguing that the laws are skewed in favor of defendants at the expense of victims. One expert highlighted the suppression of evidence in Mangione’s case as a glaring example of what they consider the flawed nature of the state’s legal framework.
This controversy over New York’s legal procedures has been brought back into focus following Judge Gregory Carro’s decision. The ruling concluded that Pennsylvania police had overstepped constitutional boundaries in their search of Mangione’s belongings, thus discarding some evidence in the process. Mangione, accused of the fatal shooting of Brian Thompson in Midtown Manhattan in December 2024, now faces trial with certain evidence barred from consideration.
New York’s evolving criminal justice policies have been contentious, particularly after a 2019 reform that eliminated cash bail for many misdemeanors and lower-level felonies. This change meant judges could no longer impose cash bail for nonviolent offenses such as drug possession, shoplifting, grand larceny, and burglary.
Luigi Mangione was present during an evidence suppression hearing at the Manhattan Supreme Court in New York City on May 18, 2026. The courtroom proceedings, covered by Steven Hirsch for the New York Post, continue to capture public attention as the case unfolds.
Luigi Mangione appears at an evidence suppression hearing at the Manhattan Supreme Court in New York City on May 18, 2026. (Steven Hirsch/New York Post)
Bail is an option for a narrow list of charges referred to as “qualifying offenses,” which are considered violent felonies, sex crimes, terrorism and a few others.
Former NYPD inspector and Fox News contributor Paul Mauro told Fox News Digital that New York is considered one of the most favorable states for criminal defendants, and said it has the “most constitutional protections for defendants relative to search and seizure.”
In Mangione’s case, as he was arrested in Pennsylvania, Mauro said that the laws in New York helped exclude evidence that can be introduced in court.
Luigi Mangione arrives at an evidence suppression hearing at the Manhattan Supreme Court in New York City on May 18, 2026. (Jeenah Moon/Reuters)
He pointed to a difference in search laws, noting that while both New York and federal law allow police to search a bag near a suspect without a warrant, New York applies a stricter standard for what counts as “within reach.”
“If the suspect can lunge for and grab an item, if it’s close enough to him that he can do that, you can search it, even a closed bag. But if it is not lungeable, grabbable, you got to get a search warrant,” Mauro said.
New York also gives broad discretion to judges in sentencing, Mauro said, adding to the reasons he thinks the state is very favorable toward criminal defendants.
“You could get a state-level judge that for some ideological reason doesn’t give him the top sentence,” he said.
Following the cash bail reform law that was passed in 2019, Ontario County Sheriff David Cirencione told Spectrum News that too much is being done for criminals and not the victims.
“We’re going overboard for the suspects and the predators and not doing enough for our victims,” Cirencione said. “I think a lot more needs to be done.”

Luigi Mangione arrives at an evidence suppression hearing at the Manhattan Supreme Court in New York City on May 18, 2026. (Jeenah Moon/Reuters)
Criminal defense attorney Donna Rotunno called New York one of the most “favorable” states for criminal defendants, adding that progressive district attorneys have only compounded the issue.
“Any big blue city with progressive DAs are always going to be places where it’s more favorable for criminal defendants,” Rotunno said. “They, you know, have progressive pretrial release programs. There’s no more cash bail… I think that from that standpoint, yes.”
Specifically, Carro ruled that the search of Mangione’s backpack at a McDonald’s was unconstitutional because it was made away from an arm’s reach. The alleged handgun found during the search, which Mangione allegedly used to kill UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, is admissible in court and can be shown to jurors.
Carro also ruled that most of Mangione’s statements that were made to police in Pennsylvania could also be admissible, other than a remark that the murder suspect made about his alleged fake ID after he was given a Miranda warning.
-->