California’s leading Democrats are deeply unsettled by a significant Supreme Court decision concerning congressional redistricting.

In a landmark ruling on Wednesday, the Supreme Court invalidated Louisiana’s electoral map, determining that the state unconstitutionally established a second majority-black House district. This decision complicates the use of racial discrimination claims as a primary justification for crafting political maps that benefit particular voter groups.

Governor Gavin Newsom of California expressed his dismay, viewing the ruling as an erosion of voting rights for minority communities.

“The Supreme Court majority continues to dismantle the Voting Rights Act and critical protections for our democracy and fair representation,” Newsom shared on X.

As a prominent figure in California’s gerrymandering initiatives to counteract Trump-supported congressional redistricting efforts in conservative states like Texas, Newsom is at the forefront of this issue.

He has urged for “nationwide reforms” to “ensure our founding ideals and the greatest experiment in democracy on earth can endure for another 250 years.”

“California will not sit back, we will continue to uphold what makes us American, and take action — over and over again — to safeguard our democracy for the generations to come,” Newsom added.

State Attorney General Rob Bonta, who has been defending California’s gerrymandering effort in court, called the decision “deeply disappointing.”

“Since 1965, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act has helped ensure that all Americans, regardless of their race, have an equal opportunity to exercise their constitutional right to vote,” Bonta said.

“While the full impact of this ruling is still uncertain, we know from past experience that decisions striking down, or effectively gutting, provisions of the Voting Rights Act are often followed by new state laws that restrict access to the ballot for voters of color.”

Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi called the decision a “devastating blow” to the Voting Rights Act.

“The consequences will be felt across the country: fewer voices heard, fewer communities represented and a democracy diminished,” she said.

“Congress must urgently pass the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to restore the full strength of the Voting Rights Act before this latest blow becomes fatal.”

That act would require states with recent histories of voter discrimination to obtain federal approval before changing voting laws.

California Republicans, on the other hand, celebrated the ruling.

State Assemblymember David Tangipa, who sued Newsom over the gerrymandering push, warned California to “get ready to redistrict.”

“No more prophylactic racial gerrymanders,” Tangipa said. “From the Prop 50 congressional maps to state legislative seats, where race heavily shaped districts (esp. for Latino ‘communities of interest’ without proven dilution), it’s time for just, race-neutral maps that represent all Californians, not racial balancing.

Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters